Further art discussions and notifications for the artwork of Sam Thorp
Having a bit of a sale on ebay right now.
http://myworld.ebay.com/samth0r
I'm challenging myself to see how many drawings I can do in a day... on top of my normal schedule and work load. These are quick figure studies. They take about 10 minutes each. They are gesture sketches. This means the energy of the arm movement is as important as the proportion and pose of the figure. They are color drawing on color paper. Mostly male but some female models as well.
I was worried a bit about flooding the market.... but that does not seem to be a problem.
It's nice to be appreciated. And I am thankful for those who have bought work so far.
February is turning out to be a record month. ... and i have one day left.
Labels: art, ebay, illustrations, male figure drawing, nude male, sale, sketches
Most people have no idea what I mean
when my bio states that I am “classically trained”.
It means
traditional, classical techniques. They still have no idea what that
means, because it's hardly ever taught any more.
|
My teacher was Irish/ Italian, but basically the same personality. |
One of the things I was taught is that
a Painting is made of paint.
And ONLY of paint. We were not allowed
to draw on the canvas and then fill it in with paint.
Because that is not a painting.... it's
a drawing colored in with paint.
Yes, there IS a difference.
I'm sure a lot of artists and “artists”
still draw on the canvas then paint over it.
And sometimes they get away with it.
But when it becomes perfectly obvious..... they have a bad
painting.
Allow me to explain.
The #2 pencil is much like a set of
training wheels.
We all start out that way. There is no
shame in it.
The shame occurs years later when you still have not
moved on.
I had training wheels on my first bike. But if I were
to go out an make a huge investment in “Big Time” Biking... say a
Harley Davidson Super Low Fatboy Softail... I wouldn't want anyone to
see me ride with the training wheels still on.
Those who know about bikes will know
how ridiculous that is.
And those who know about painting will
know when its a pencil drawing colored in with paint.
The #2 pencil is awesome and unifying the most
basic and common tool for writing/ drawing/ mark making. But that's
also what makes it so bad. It's common. It's basic.
I am quite amused by the number of
people who seem perplexed that when I draw, I use color.
As if it never occurred to them to use
anything besides the common, basic #2 pencil.
Imagine that, an artist taking a
creative approach.
So maybe some artists start their
“painting” with a pencil because it never occurs to them to do
otherwise.
Sure sketching and working out an idea
a head of time IS important.
But when its time to start painting...
start by painting.
Consider this: if you can draw that
image on the canvas with a pencil, why can't you do it with a brush?
What exactly IS the difference between
using a pencil and using a brush?
Is it harder to do with a brush? Does
it require a bit more skill?
Is ir fair to say that being able to manipulate a brush
and paint with precision equal to a pencil... is that more rare of a
skill to have?
So being able to render shapes with a
brush is perhaps ..more advanced?
And all those still using pencil is ..
more common.. more basic?
Sure some artist can use pencil and
make it look good and no one cares about the “purity” of painting
being done entirely in paint anyway. Some cover up their pencil
skills with paint convincingly. Some think they have found a loop
hole with those drawing paint sticks. Some deliberately break this
rule ironically and it works in their favor.
But if you are avoiding the paint brush
because you are lazy, or fearful, or it's just too darn hard....
chances are those who know.... will know.
If it is “harder” to draw out your
image on a canvas with a brush, how will you ever get better painting
skills if you keep falling back on your pencil skills?
SO... the painting done entirely in
paint is at least trying to be more skillful, more advanced and more
rare? And perhaps has a slight edge over the “painting” that is a
drawing colored in with paint?
So maybe its time to let go of the #2
pencil AND those drawing oil sticks; and learn some skills.
Labels: classical, drawing, education, painting, skills
Making art is a little... or rather a lot, like Zen.
The problem your artwork is having is completely obvious... and the solution to fix it is equally obvious.
Yet, it takes us ages to notice this and even longer to do the work of making the necessary changes.
Quite often the changes never happen because it's just too much work.
Like Zen.. like diet & exercise.
Hard work is the only way to do it.
We all know this, yet we hope for an easy quick- fix solution.
There isn't one.
There never will be.
Now get back to work.
(inspired by Brad Warner)
Labels: art, work ethic, zen
The Wall Street Journal, when comparing The White House’s college rankings site, finds that the schools with the highest median debt come from arts schools. The country’s highest median debt load upon graduation sits at $52,035; that startling figure comes from The Creative Center, a for-profit art college in Omaha, Nebraska. New York’s Manhattan School of Music comes in second with a median debt load of $47,000.
source: http://artfcity.com/2013/02/19/from-new-york-to-nebraska-art-schools-top-the-white-houses-debt-scorecard/
52k ub debt thanks to the Creative Center in Omaha Nebraska....
Let's take a look shall we?
http://creativecenter.edu/
Founded in 1993
"Our goal is to create great graphic designers".....
who may make $22k a year in Nebraska as graphic designers.
hmmm....
Look if you want to be an artist there is a LOT to learn.
If you want to make a living at art there is even more to learn.
I'm not sure art schools are the best place to learn it anymore.
I'm not sure it's worth the huge debt.
What are the other options?
Public Libraries
Internet
local art centers, clubs and groups.
and of course the art galleries themselves.
I've explained some oprions for art education here:
http://samthor.blogspot.com/2011/12/so-i-wanna-go-to-art-school.html
Labels: art education, art schools, debt
Pittsburgh, PA March, 1 2013- Salon
des Femmes de la Yinz at the Morris Levy Gallery
I'm helping to put this event together.
Even though it is estimated that 51% of
all working visual artists today are women; only 5% of the art
currently display in American museums is by women. So to bring
awareness to this inequality and to right this wrong: LUPEC brings
you a show of art by local feminist artists who may someday end up in
the history books themselves. Each of these talented and Classy Art
Broads will be celebrated in honor of our Classy Art Forebroads.
Expect to see some amazing art and delicious and rare cocktails.
Gallery Opening: Friday March 1st
6pm- to 11pm as part of Unblurred.
Admission is free. Parking is free.
The show will continue through the month of March.
LUPEC (Ladies United for the
Preservation of Endangered Cocktails) works tirelessly in a world
of beer and pre-packaged CHEXTM
mix to breed, raise and release cocktails that are endangered or
even believed to be extinct in today's society. LUPEC continues the
150 year American tradition of dangerous women calling themselves
Ladies and getting together I n groups, clubs, and societies to work
under cover while chipping away at the patriarchy.
Morris Levy Gallery
A new space for art, music and
performance located at 3634 Penn Ave. Pittsburgh, PA 15201
Labels: art, feminism, pgh. lupec, women's art history month
Find my Male Nude sketches in ink available only at Fine Art for Men.
http://www.fineart4men.com/collection/90.html
Purchase some beauties such as:
Why it's time for galleries to dump the jargon
The art world uses words everyone else has dropped
by CHRISTINA PATTERSON
You might, for example, wonder why they seem to think it's better to use the word "notion" than "idea", or the word "narrative" than "story", or the word "interrogate" than "ask". You might wonder why every piece of art they write about seems to "subvert" something, or "disrupt" something, or "deconstruct" something, and why what it seems to "subvert" or "disrupt" often seems to be "traditional hierarchies". You might wonder what those "traditional hierarchies" were. You might, for example, want to ask if they were the "hierarchies" of a world where art is bought by hedge funders as an investment, and a brand. But if you looked at the art that was meant to be "subverting traditional hierarchies", or "interrogating capitalism", you might wonder why, if the artist hated capitalism so much, the work was so often for sale.
read the full article here: http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/art/features/why-its-time-for-galleries-to-dump-the-jargon-8480622.html
It's a delicate balance that i have yet to master.
On the one hand we DO have specialized terminology that we need to know.
It's much better than trying to explain with "thingamajiggs" and "doohickeys".
But when the language is used to alienate or to deliberately confuse, it can backfire.
I was once told that the truly masterful can break down concepts into the simplest terms. Labels: art, art speak, language, terminology